DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF INTERSECTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING: A MONTE CARLO STUDY ON IRT AND RANDOM FOREST APPROACHES

dc.contributor.advisorManapat, Patrick D
dc.contributor.authorBain, Catherine Marie
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSong, Hairong
dc.contributor.committeeMemberManapat, Danielle
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEthridge, Lauren
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCao, Jie
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-06T19:04:14Z
dc.date.embargoExpiration
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.proquestAvailable01/01/2026
dc.date.updated2026-05-06T19:04:14Z
dc.description.abstractPsychological researchers frequently use self-report scales to classify individuals into diagnostic categories. Item response theory (IRT) is the recommended family of mathematical models for scoring psychological scales. The accuracy of IRT scores is dependent upon the extent to which the assumptions invoked by the IRT model are met. Techniques such as multi-group IRT allow for more accurate estimation of scores when the assumption of item invariance is violated. However, if the grouping variable causing differential item functioning (DIF) is complex, unmeasured, or unknown, modeling DIF through the IRT framework becomes unreasonable. Random forests (RF), as a nonparametric machine learning approach, do not assume item invariance and may be a reasonable approach to classification when DIF is complex, unmeasured, or unknown. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, this study examined the performance of three IRT-based approaches and one RF-based approach to classification when data contained complex DIF caused by multiple demographic variables. Classification performance was evaluated across six metrics: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, negative predictive value, and F1 score. Results indicate that the classification performance of the second-order IRT model-based approach was higher than that of either of the multidimensional IRT model-based approaches. Higher classification performance was observed from the RF-based approach than the second-order IRT-based approach in most conditions. However, in conditions where the focal group was simulated to have the same or higher levels of the latent trait than the reference group, second-order IRT-based classifications were more sensitive than RF classifications. Additionally, the classification performance of the RF approach was strongly associated with measurement error, such that more measurement error led to lower classification performance.
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2767-6882
dc.identifier.urihttps://shareok.org//handle/11244/342475
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oklahoma – Graduate College
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectdifferential item functioning
dc.subjectitem response theory
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectpsychometrics
dc.subjectrandom forest
dc.thesis.degreeD.Phil.
dc.titleDIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF INTERSECTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING: A MONTE CARLO STUDY ON IRT AND RANDOM FOREST APPROACHES
ou.groupPsychology: Arts & Sciences

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bain_oklahoma_2409A_10626.pdf
Size:
3.86 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.01 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: