A Study of Self-Paced and Machine-Paced Inspection

dc.contributor.authorBetina Schlegel
dc.contributor.authorMargarita Beneke
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:35:30Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:49Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:35:30Z
dc.date.issued1986-09-01
dc.description.abstractA study was conducted to investigate the performance of inspectors under different conditions using computer generated visual test items. The purpose of the study was to compare performance for self-paced vs. machine-paced inspection tasks. The factors considered were searching for a single type of flaw vs. three types of flaws, the viewing time for machine-paced inspection, and the type of instruction for self-paced inspection. The results showed that performance was better when subjects searched for only one type of flaw. Performance improved with increased viewing time, but was not affected by the type of instruction. There was no difference between self-paced and machine-paced inspection provided the viewing time was sufficient. Overall, performance in self-paced inspection was better.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.citationSchlegel, B., & Beneke, M. (1986). A Study of Self-Paced and Machine-Paced Inspection. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 30(5), 471-475. doi: 10.1177/154193128603000514en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/154193128603000514en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/25465
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US
dc.titleA Study of Self-Paced and Machine-Paced Inspectionen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1177.154193128603000514.pdf
Size:
331.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format