Diatoms on the carapace of common snapping turtles: Luticola spp. dominate despite spatial variation in assemblages

dc.contributor.authorShelly C. Wu
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth A. Bergey
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T23:19:04Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T23:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-13
dc.descriptionWe thank Cameron Siler, Caryn Vaughn, and Eric Bright for providing advice and comments on versions the manuscript, and Jessa Watters and Alan Resetar for assistance at the Sam Noble Museum and Field Museum, respectively. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on this manuscript.en_US
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.description.abstractFilamentous algae are often visible on the carapaces of freshwater turtles and these algae are dominated by a few species with varying geographic distributions. Compared to filamentous algae, little is known about the much more speciose microalgae on turtles. Our objectives were to compare the diatom flora on a single turtle species (the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina) across part of its range to examine spatial patterns and determine whether specific diatom taxa were consistently associated with turtles (as occurs in the filamentous alga Basicladia spp.). Using preserved turtle specimens from museums, we systematically sampled diatoms on the carapaces of 25 snapping turtles across five states. The diverse diatom assemblages formed two groups–the southern Oklahoma group and the northern Illinois/Wisconsin/New York group, with Arkansas not differing from either group. Of the six diatom species found in all five states, four species are widespread, whereas Luticola cf. goeppertiana and L. cf. mutica are undescribed species, known only from turtles in our study. L. cf. goeppertiana comprised 83% of the diatom abundance on Oklahoma turtles and was relatively more abundant on southern turtles (Oklahoma and Arkansas) than on northern turtles (where mean abundance/state was > 10%). L. cf. mutica was the most abundant species (40%) on New York turtles. Some Luticola species are apparently turtle associates and results support a pattern of spatial variation in Luticola species, similar to that in Basicladia. Using museum specimens is an efficient and effective method to study the distribution of micro-epibionts.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttp://www.plosone.org/static/editorial#peeren_US
dc.identifier.citationWu SC, Bergey EA (2017) Diatoms on the carapace of common snapping turtles: Luticola spp. dominate despite spatial variation in assemblages. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171910. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171910en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0171910en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/50427
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLos One
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE 12(2): e0171910
dc.relation.urihttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0171910
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectTurtles,Diatoms,Algae,Museum collections,Fresh water,Freshwater ecology,Marine ecology,Oklahomaen_US
dc.titleDiatoms on the carapace of common snapping turtles: Luticola spp. dominate despite spatial variation in assemblagesen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0171910.pdf
Size:
932.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format